(a) Statement. (b) Statement. (c) Not a statement (question). (d) Statement (truth may be disputed, but itβs truth-apt). (e) Not a (classical) statement (liar paradox; no consistent truth value). (f) Not a statement (command).
Open sentences and domains: (a) Open; domain typically \(\mathbb{R}\text{.}\) (b) Open; domain: the set of dogs. (c) Statement. (d) Open; domain: propositions/statements. (e) Statement. (f) Statement.
Invalid. A direct proof of βfor all even \(n\text{,}\)\(n^3\) is evenβ must begin with an arbitrary even \(n=2k\) and show \(n^3=8k^3\) is even. A single example (\(n=2\)) does not prove the universal statement.
\((a b c d)=(2r+1)(2s+1)(2t+1)(2u+1)=2k+1\) for some integer \(k\text{,}\) hence the product is odd. (The sum of four odd integers is even.) Thus βtheir sum or their product is oddβ is true (indeed, the product is always odd).
Biconditionals: (b) and (e). Item (c) is not a sound biconditional as stated unless a domain is specified; with \(n\in\mathbb{Z}\) it becomes trivially true but uninformative. Items (a) and (d) are not biconditionals (and (d) is false: \(x=\pm1\) both solve \(x^4=1\) over the integers).
\(\{q\in\mathbb{Q}\mid |q| < 4\}\) is infinite; a roster with ellipses: \(\{\ldots,-\dfrac{7}{2},-2,-\dfrac{3}{2},-1,0,1,\dfrac{3}{2},2,\dfrac{7}{2},\ldots\}\text{.}\)
If \(x\in A\cap B\text{,}\) then \(x\in A\) and \(x\in B\text{,}\) so \(A\cap B\subseteq A\) and \(A\cap B\subseteq B\text{.}\) For unions, generally \(A\cup B\) is not a subset of both. Counterexample: \(A=\{1\}\text{,}\)\(B=\{2\}\text{;}\) then \(A\cup B=\{1,2\}\) is not a subset of \(A\) (nor of \(B\)). (In fact, \(A\subseteq A\cup B\) and \(B\subseteq A\cup B\text{.}\))
Subsection9.1.4Solutions to βExplanatory and Critical Thinking Questionsβ
ExercisesExercises
1.
Solution.
Disagree. βThis statement is falseβ is self-referential and yields a contradiction under classical bivalence: if itβs true, it says itβs false; if itβs false, it must be true. Because it cannot be consistently assigned a truth value, it is not treated as a (well-formed) statement in classical logic.
The flaw is assuming questions/commands can be given truth values without rephrasing. Truth values apply to propositions (declarative sentences). A question or command must first be converted into a proposition (e.g., βYou will give me the snacksβ) before truth evaluation is meaningful.
Not correct. The student stated the inverse. The correct contrapositive of βIf square then four sidesβ is: βIf a shape does not have four sides, then it is not a square.β
They used a single example (\(n=2\)). A universal conditional must be proved for arbitrary even \(n\text{:}\) write \(n=2k\text{,}\) then \(n^2=4k^2\text{,}\) which is divisible by 4.
Disagree. The empty set is defined to have no elements; its existence is postulated (and unique) in standard set theory. Knowing it exists does not require it to contain anything.
The union collects elements that are in either set, so it generally cannot be a subset of both. Example: \(A=\{1\}\text{,}\)\(B=\{2\}\text{;}\) then \(A\cup B=\{1,2\}\) is not a subset of \(A\) or of \(B\text{.}\) By contrast, \(A\cap B\) is always a subset of each.